http://allianceminnesota.org/page/community/tag_rss/Robert+Ambrogi Good News for Court-Appointed Lawyers   Oyez: Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority) Sort by Ideology (More information here ) Decision: 9 votes for Gideon, 0 vote(s) against Legal Provision: Right to Counsel Warren Black Douglas Clark Harlan Brennan Stewart White GoldbergFull Opinion by Justice Hugo L. Black  Yesterday was the 46th anniversary of Gideon v. Wainwright , the Supreme Court's 1963 decision holding that states have a constitutional obligation to provide court-appointed lawyers for indigent criminal defendants. "In our adversary system of criminal justice, any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him," Justice Hugo L. Black wrote for the court. "This seems to us to be an obvious truth." Gideon spawned systems for court appointment of criminal defense lawyers in every state and in the federal courts. But those systems are not without problems. At the state level, ensuring adequate funding is an ongoing battle. And for the lawyers who take court-appointed cases, ensuring adequate compensation is a whole other battle. Hourly rates paid to court-appointed lawyers remain well below private-market rates. That said, private lawyers who take court-appointed cases in the federal system just got a pay raise. Last week, James C. Duff, director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, issued a memorandum directing the federal courts to increase the hourly rates and case maximums. As of March 11, the hourly rate for non-capital cases went from 0 to 0. For capital cases, the hourly rate went from 0 to 5. The maximum that a lawyer can bill for a case went from ,800 for a felony trial to ,600 and from ,200 for a misdemeanor trial to ,400. The maximum for a felony appeal is now ,100, up from ,600, and for a misdemeanor appeal ,100, up from ,600. The federal Office of Defender Services has detailed information about the new rates and maximums. Sphere: Related Content Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on March 19, 2009 at 11:16 AM RePosted by Sharon Anderson Educational Purposes: neopopulism.org - Home Latest News Minnesota Supreme Court Grants Expedited Review in IRV Case! 211B.06 Case Set for Hearing In U.S. District Court on May 29! Per Diem Court of Appeals Hearing Set for May 9! State of Minnesota v. Mark Allaman, et al. Star Tribune Covers Wolfchild Appellate Decision   neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack  Nancy Lazaryan's  *  *  * WHAT IS LAW *  *  *Foundation FOUNDATIONS Seminar Part One by Nancy Lazaryan Putting MN Legislato... 28:48 - Secretary-Of-State-0... 15:29 - St-Paul-Council-Meet... 12:54 - Disclaimer: The Law affects ALL, Wrath of God Turbulence of Nature Sharon Anderson with Humble knowledge of the You Tube YouTube - Sharon4Anderson's Channel  Award the Sal Seniors Vigirnia Wendt age 92 with her Positive Health,Healing,Humor and her Prayer. http://allianceminnesota.org/page/community/post/sharonanderson/BcG http://allianceminnesota.org/page/community/post/sharonanderson/BcG/commentary#comments Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:46:31 EDT http://allianceminnesota.org/page/community/post/sharonanderson/BcG Sharon4Anderson http://allianceminnesota.org/page/community/profile_picture/7c89be54631f8f845f_rlm6i6zpv.jpg Sharon4Anderson 0 http://allianceminnesota.org/page/community/comment_rss/BcG/