Nancy Lazaryan speaks with her co-host, from many public access ... This or other video clips might be used in our "In the Interests of ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAC6w_HC5Cw -
Putting MN Legislators On Notice To Obey Their Oath of Office Part 129 min - May 7, 2008 - Nancy Lazaryan representing the citizens, serving the executive, ... <embed id=" VideoPlayback" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid ... video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6576283240629348809 -
Severson Ltr Lazaryan09 03 - 8:34am Dan Severson at 651-296-7808 Nancy Lazaryan at nancylazaryan@yahoo.com Friday, February 27, ... Add YouTube videos to your SlideShare presentations... more ... www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/severson-ltr-lazaryan09-03 - 45k - Cached - Similar pages -
Bernard Madoff's Criminal Charges Prior to Plea Agreement U.S. V. MADOFF (U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D. N.Y., Mar. 10, 2009) - The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed revised criminal charges against alleged Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff. The criminal information filed today accompanied confirmation by Ira Sorkin, Bernard Madoff's criminal defense lawyer, that his client would plead guilty to federal charges. Read more...
Your health care information is heading to Maine, where it will be encrypted, analyzed and crunched so Minnesota health officials can learn more about the way medical services are delivered. The program is meant to empower consumers, increase quality and reduce costs. Some opponents, however, want the data collection "reform" program scrapped or, at the very least, the data kept in the state.
Antitrust by our Government: Fri the 13thMar09 Hearing to expose the numerous
complaints of State Judges, which may triggr Federal Judges re: Kyle and Medtronic
If you cannot attend at least send e-mail, the SCAP Panel is a Secret Court without
Scrunity, Committing Persons to State Hospitals without Jury Trials then the Madoff
Ponsi Scheme indirectly with many nonprofits triggers the Outsourcing of our Medical Records to MAINE
What happens to the duplication of Health Records outsourced to FRANCE.
Disclaimer: Consolidation of information Thank You for visiting, We must advocate for the Public's Right and Priviledge to make our government accountable. PS I think current Impeachments are to be submitted ?
With alittle help from my internet friends: For Public Education of our State and Federal Courts,Constitutions, forensic files,pic's etc. scotus blog - Google Search Granted Affiant is no Tina Totenberg (sp), 30 yrs of seeking redress must not go unanswered.SCOTUSblog
Congratulations to the 47 yr old Barack Hussein Obama who is a lawyer, and when he swears under OATH to become our 44th President of the US. At some point the quality of life, Constitutional Mandates, with mllions of Bloggers, Internet Savy Persons. ECF and Pacer Accounts, must have government accountability. Read what you may, Fight if you Must, Please Save our Country for another DAY. Hold Obama Accountable for Change.
Watched "Sex Traffic" for the 1st time on Cable Don sutherland Sex Traffic Don Sutherland Cable TV - Google Search, Horrors of the Real World in the USA must abate Secret Courts, Secret Unpublished Opinions,Secret Hearings for the Public Good. The Powers to be must act and or react at the right time for National Security.
President Bush Commutes Sentences of Compean and Ramos In his final acts of clemency, President George W. Bush on Monday commuted the prison sentences of two former U.S. Border Patrol agents whose convictions for shooting a Mexican drug dealer ignited fierce debate about illegal immigration. Read the Full Story. Hopefully for our Children,relatives,peers, Obama will also be Humbled by Drug and Sex Traffic.
I have long railed Vs the FISA Court , another product of the Carter administration.
I can think of nothing more more un-American than a Secret Court manned by anonymous judges, weilding power exceeding that of the elected President. Rich Martin
Well, today they are reporting one more of those infamous 5-4 decisions.
It is beyond belief that 9 honest men can read a contract of but a few pages, and come out with diffferent ideas of what they read. Either the 200-year-old contract is faulty, or the men dishonest. Either way, this govt is a lost cause. Time for a new one. Rich Martin
Some oaths of office are a statement of loyalty to a constitution or other legal text or to a person or other office-holder (e.g., an oath to support the constitution of the state, or of loyalty to the king). Under the laws of a state it may be considered treason or a high crime to betray a sworn oath of office. No. 08-570Docket for 08-570Title:Philip J. Berg, Petitionerv.Barack Obama, et al.Docketed:October 31, 2008Lower Ct:United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Case Nos.:(08-4340) Rule 11 ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Oct 30 2008Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008) Oct 31 2008Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.Nov 3 2008Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.Nov 3 2008Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter. Nov 18 2008Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed. Dec 1 2008Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.Dec 8 2008Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.Dec 9 2008Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter. Dec 15 2008Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy. Dec 17 2008DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009.Dec 17 2008Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy. Dec 18 2008Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia. Dec 23 2008Application (08A505) referred to the Court. Dec 23 2008DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.Jan 12 2009Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson GRANTED. Jan 12 2009Petition DENIED.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~Attorneys for Petitioner: Philip J. Berg555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12(610) 825-3134 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Party name: Philip J. BergAttorneys for Respondents: Gregory G. GarreSolicitor General(202) 514-2217 United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530-0001 Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.Other: Lawrence J. JoyceLawrence J. Joyce LLC(520) 584-0236 1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215 Tucson, AZ 85712 barmemberlj@earthlink.netParty name: Bill Anderson
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Over Obama’s CitizenshipBy Kate Phillips
Without any comment whatsoever, the Supreme Court today declined to take up an appeal by a New Jersey man who questioned President-elect Barack Obama’s eligibility for the presidency, based on his birth to a father from Kenya and a mother who was a United States citizen.
Reposted: God,Gates,Google, we love you, We understand the financial Clout,must insure the Average person has the Wealth of the Web, re published for Educational Purposes click on the interactive for the Donors Dreamworks $250 thouGates$200.5,Google and Soros $150 Wall Street Is Big Donor to Inauguration - WSJ.com
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks...will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." -- President, Thomas Jefferson
"IN A TIME OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT, TELLING THE TRUTH IS A REVOLUTIONARY ACT." - GEORGE ORWELL
Breaking: Illinois House votes to impeach Blagojevich --State House Leader says Blagojevich has 'forfeited his right to hold office' 09 Jan 2009 The Illinois House voted overwhelmingly Friday to impeach Gov. Rod Blagojevich, an unprecedented action that sets up a Senate trial on whether he should be thrown out for allegedly trying to sell President-elect Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat. Impeachment required just 60 votes. The final result was 114-1.
Please forward this newsletter to anyone you think might be interested.
BrowseStatutes at Large Browse Page Headings Search this Title through the Collections Search Page
Note: The eighteen volumes presented in this online collection cover the laws of the first forty-three Congresses, 1789-1875. Statutes at Large
The United States Statutes at Large, commonly referred to as the Statutes at Large, is the official source for the laws and resolutions passed by Congress. Publication began in 1845 by the private firm of Little, Brown and Company under authority granted by a joint resolution of Congress. In 1874, Congress transferred the authority to publish the Statutes at Large to the Government Printing Office, which has been responsible for producing the set since that time.
Every law, public and private, ever enacted by the Congress is published in the Statutes at Large in order of the date of its passage. Until 1948, all treaties and international agreements approved by the Senate were also published in the set. In addition, the Statutes at Large includes the text of the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, amendments to the Constitution, treaties with Indians and foreign nations, and presidential proclamations.
.* The files are PDF image-over-text and searchable. We have a local search form on the page that will enable search through the entire set once Google indexes it. To the best of our knowledge they are not available anywhere else online, either on a government site or a university site.
Thanks for production and OCR of the PDF files is due to lawyer and scholar Larry Becraft of Huntsville, Alabama. ______Larry Becraft - Google Search * A little clean-up work remains on this page. We will add the 2008 Statutes at Large as soon as they are available. Note that Vols. 6-8 are not a gap in the statutes, only in the volume numbering.
-- Jon
------------------------------------------------------------------- Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 www.constitution.orgjon.roland@constitution.org
Affiant Sharon Anderson with Standing to Challenge the Minnesota State Primary 9Sept08_ (64A) to be filled 4Nov08 Elections, Sharon voted Absentee and by pdf format ie: Electronically was denied a Presidential Primary, did vote pdf 4Nov08, If US Senate 08 Absentee Ballots are thrown Olmstead v US 277US438(1928)out the entire Ballot must be tossed:If Government become the Lawbreaker and these ballots do NOT DECEND TO PARTICULARS us v. cruikshank - Google Search and for educational purposes to Notify the State of Minnesota,Minnesota State Constitution Electorate, Governor,Legislature,Canvass Boards,MN Supreme CourtMinnesota Constitution: Article III, all Voters and Candidates on this New Years Eve
Dr. Orly's YouTube ChannelMonday, December 29, 2008 Open letter to Member of Congress URGENT REQUEST FOR ACTION – TO PRESERVE OUR CONSTITUTION
Dear Member of the U.S. Congress;
On January 8th, 2009, you will be meeting in a joint session of Congress in order to perform the final step of COUNTING and CONFIRMING the electoral votes for the President of the United States (POTUS).
This urgent letter is a request by your (and Mr. Obama’s) employers, We The People, for you to submit an OBJECTION to those votes being counted due to the Constitutional INELIGIBILITY of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. to serve as POTUS:
1. No proof that he was born on U.S. sovereign territory, as required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution (the posting of his forged & fraudulent Certification of Live Birth (C.O.L.B.) only proves fraud – and that he’s INELIGIBLE;
2. No proof that he ever applied for U.S. citizenship, when reaching the age of majority, following his years as a citizen of Indonesia (this would make him ‘naturalized’, and therefore INELIGIBLE);
3. No proof that he was born of two parents of U.S. citizenship, with both owing allegiance to and being under the jurisdiction of the U.S., as required by law and/or the Constitution, in order to be a ‘natural-born citizen’. (actually he has freely admitted the opposite to be true, and therefore INELIGIBLE);
4. No proof that he was authorized, as a ‘natural-born U.S. citizen’ with a U.S. Passport, to travel to Pakistan in 1981 (he could not by law), or that he re-applied for ‘naturalized’ U.S. citizenship on his return, which would also make him INELIGIBLE;
5. No certified proof that he registered for the draft/Selective Service between the ages of 18 and 26, as required by law, thereby rendering him ineligible, by law, for employment in the Executive Branch of our government, and therefore INELIGIBLE for POTUS. (NOTE: over a year of multiple FOIA requests produced a forged and blatantly fraudulent Selective Service Registration form that should be cause for indictments and arrests);
6. No proof that he is, in fact, not an illegal alien, and therefore subject to the same penalties that would befall all illegal aliens in his situation. Therefore, INELIGIBLE;
Constructive Knowledge would inform and confirm to all who have examined the facts of this collossal fraud being perpetrated upon We The People of America (see www.DrOrly.Blogspot.com – ‘Open Letter to C.J. Roberts’) that confirming the electoral votes and thereby furthering the act of installing Mr. Obama as POTUS could possibly be construed as failure to honor one’s oath of office.
Therefore, we are calling on you, as a member of Congress, sworn to uphold, protect, and defend that Constitution, to OBJECT to the counting and confirmation of those electoral votes until proof of his eligibility or ineligibility can be determined, and to call for indictments in regard to any and all alleged violations of U.S. laws and one’s sworn oath.
Please let us know if you intend to stand with We The People in this epic battle to defend and preserve our Constitution. Our Nation can survive four years of any President. It cannot survive without a Constitution.
Sincerely;
We The People of the United States of America
Please advise of your INTENT TO OBJECT to Doctor.Taitz@gmail.com
Note: Do not use this email address if you are not a member of Congress RSS DrOrlyTV Dr. Orly Taitz If you want to contact me, send me an email at dr_taitz@yahoo.com.
Philip Berg's earlier case and a request for an injunction in the case are scheduled for conferences with the justices on Jan. 9 and Jan. 16.
The new case, filed with co-counsel Lawrence J. Joyce, was submitted to U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., and names as defendant "Barry Soetoro a/k/a Obama."
It demands to know Obama's real name and his constitutional qualifications to occupy the Oval Office. The plaintiff is Gregory S. Hollister, a resident of Colorado Springs, who has "standing" and "needs a decision so he knows whether or not to follow any order of Soetoro a/k/a Obama."
Submitted in Good Faith for Election Reform, Integrity for the Public's Right to Know, MN Canvass Board to challenge Ballots without evidentiary hearing of the Author of the Ballot is Constitutionally Unacceptable.in other words, these Canvass Judges ie: Lawyers except Sec. State Mark Ritchie, are implementing their own opinions without coming face to face with the Author of the Ballots, ie: Voter. techinally a copyright violations? by these Judges?
PS Are you aware Obama-Biden-Hillary_Coulter_Orly_Berg are all LAWYERS
Dear Sharon Please go to http://change.gov and sign in to submit and vote on questions, especially those submitted by me. I don't know if this will have much impact, but it could, and we need to take advantage of every opportunity to defend the Constitution. You can find my questions by searching on my name or on "constitution". Please spread this message to other forums. -- Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------- Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 www.constitution.orgjon.roland@constitution.org
To change this country, we're counting on Americans from every walk of life to get involved. Tell us how an experience in your life showed you something that is right or something that is wrong with this country -- and share your ideas for how to make it better.
May it Please AllianceMN Sharon must share her numerous e-mails of info. today 3 are Relevant, check the links on Blogs.
Regardless of Political Affiliations, this Political Junkie HaHa is rather well read an informed For the New Year
Dear Sharon:
Thanks again for reading WorldNetDaily – the Internet's premiere independent news website. Following is a message we believe will interest you. As always, we appreciate your readership and support Sincerely,The WorldNetDaily team Author of Born Liberal, Raised Right'
CIVIL PROCEDURE, CONTRACTS, CORPORATION & ENTERPRISE LAW, SECURITIES LAW Abbotts v. Campbell, No. 08-1349 Participants in a Common Stock Purchase Agreement failed to show that the nondisclosure of a waiver of certain provisions of that Agreement was a proximate cause of their investment losses. The investors also failed to show that they exercised reasonable diligence warranting equitable tolling of the six-year statute of limitations specified by Minnesota Statute section 541.05. Read more...
information material to a non-fraud claim will toll a limitations period. Cohen v.
Appert, 463 N.W.2d 787, 790 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). Likewise, the doctrine of
fraudulent concealment “only tolls the limitations period until the concealment is or
could have been discovered through reasonable diligence.” Id. at 790-91 (citing Wild
v. Rarig, 234 N.W.2d 775, 795 (Minn. 1975)). The party relying on the doctrine must
show that its own negligence did not contribute to the delay in discovery. Cohen, 463
N.W.2d at 791.
Following IGM’s collapse in July 1994, the Investors made no effort to obtain
the documents seized by the government to investigate the reason for IGM’s failure.
The Investors simply state that they could not have discovered the waiver because it
was in government custody. The record shows, however, that access was granted to
Daniel T. Zacharias after he explained that he hoped to rehabilitate IGM. Although
Zacharias’s access was limited because the government was preparing its case, there
is no indication that the government would have denied access to the Investors or that
it would not have provided the documents upon completion of its case. The Investors
knew that Defendants failed to register their shares as promised and that this prevented
them from selling their shares for a profit. They also knew that something was
drastically wrong when the FBI raided IGM. Yet, the Investors sought no recourse
from Defendants. Following the complete loss of their investment in IGM, the
Investors have largely lost or discarded their documents relating to their investment
and have written off the losses they incurred.
-7-
As the district court noted, it appears that the Investors gave no thought to IGM
until an attorney’s solicitation letter touting a previous success arrived eleven years
after the loss. The record reflects indifference and opportunism rather than reasonable
diligence. “Statutes of limitation serve a general purpose of repose, the interest of
both the defendant and society in freedom from stale claims.” Bartlett v. Miller &
Schroeder Muns., Inc., 355 N.W.2d 435, 439 (Minn. App. 1984). The interests of
justice do not require the tolling of the limitations period in this instance. See id.
B.
Additionally, the Investors “have failed to present specific facts giving rise to
a genuine issue for trial as to the causal connection” between their losses and the
nondisclosure of the waiver. Lubbers v. Anderson, 539 N.W.2d 398, 401 (Minn.
1995). Although proximate cause is generally a fact question for the jury, “where
reasonable minds can arrive at only one conclusion, proximate cause is a question of
law.” Lubbers, 539 N.W.2d at 402 (quoting Warnick v. Moss & Barnett, 490 N.W.2d
108, 113 (Minn. 1993)). The Investors’ proximate cause argument rests on the bald
assertion that they would have sold their shares if they had known of the waiver. That
one can look back with the knowledge of fluctuating stock prices and the impending
failure of the company and say that he would have sold at a particular time is simply
too self-serving and speculative to form the foundation of a causal connection. The
record, including the Investor’s expert testimony, does “nothing more than show a
mere possibility, suspicion, or conjecture that such a causal connection exists, without
any foundation for the exclusion of other admittedly possible causes,” and thus
“provides no proper foundation for a finding of a causal connection.” Bernloehr v.
Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 208 N.W.2d 753, 755 (Minn. 1973).
The Investors’ claims do not merit equitable tolling and the Investors have
failed to present sufficient evidence of causation. Accordingly, the district court’s
judgment is affirmed.
____________________Sharons Disclaimer __________Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 political ?(Sharon4Anderson?) Alliance for a Better Minnesota | Sharon Anderson's BlogClick here: Sharon4Councilfile4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson | Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: DashboardAndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy ActThe CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
Posts
