Get Updates
Post from Joe's Blog:
Brief State Supreme Court Update
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

Today oral arguments were finally heard in the State Supreme Court, moving us one step closer to having two full, real-life, United States Senators! For those of you who weren't watching the coverage over at the uptake, Rick Hasen, Electoral Law Professor at Loyola Law School was live blogging. He thinks that it is going to be tough sledding for Norm Coleman. A couple of points from his post:

4. The reason Coleman is having a harder time is that he's got a tougher road to success:
a. The state Supreme Court is going to deter to the factual findings of the trial court, and those factual findings favor Franken.
b. The state Supreme Court's existing precedent in terms of treating absentee ballots strictly as a matter of fraud-prevention favors Franken. A change in that standard now, as I've argued, would create a due process argument for Franken by constituting a change in the rules of the election after the fact.
c. Even if the court accepted some of Coleman's arguments in the abstract---such as that there were some votes illegally counted by some jurisdictions (or alternatively, some ballots accepted under a looser "substantial compliance" standard)-- that doesn't mean Coleman would win his case. He'd have to show that there were enough problems to make a difference in the outcome of the election (a point the Justices expressed a great deal of skepticism about, in their discussion of the failure of the offer of proof).
d. On the merits, the Justices mentioned ways of distinguishing other cases in which there were due process problems, such as when voters relied upon rules of the game that were changed later. There was an interesting discussion of whether Bush v. Gore eliminated the requirement that a challenger prove intentional discrimination to make out an equal protection argument. It was the only line of argument that I saw potentially helping Coleman, but it did not appear to be enough to overcome the Justice's skepticism.

Things aren't looking good for Norm once again. Head over to www.seatoursenator.com and add your name to the petition to seat our 2nd senator. For more information on the recount, check out the Star Tribune's recap, as well as the video recap from the uptake. We'll have more information regarding the court case as it comes along.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

No comments have been written yet.






All Network Posts
The Emmer Budget Plan: There is No Spoon.
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update Either Tom Emmer is still stuck on the first stage of grief because of his disastrous campaign to date, which re...
Read more | Comments (0)

Police Department Relies on Residents to Keep K-9 Unit
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update Last summer, we set out on the Make Minnesota Thrive Drive , a tour of the state to find out what makes our state gre...
Read more | Comments (1)

RELEASE: Tom Emmer Makes False Claims on Role in DWI Legislation
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update Emmer Makes False Claims on Role in DUI Legislation : Supporters of Lessening Penalties for Drunk Drivers Were Defense...
Read more | Comments (4)

Oil Spills Also Happen in Minnesota
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update A new study from the National Wildlife Federation came out today, which emphasizes the fact that oil spill aren’t...
Read more | Comments (0)

Emmer's Response to Ad "Insulting" -- Minnesotans Deserve Better Than Vague Excuses, Blaming Others
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update  Republican Gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer responded to a new ad being run by Alliance for a Better Minnesota...
Read more | Comments (0)

"The Target I Knew Was The Target That Embraced Its Gay Employees"
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update Target Corp. is in full damage control mode this week. Why? Because people aren't happy about the corporation's decis...
Read more | Comments (0)

Potholes are the Result of Funding Cuts
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update Pothole. They’re always an annoyance, but this year it’s become something of a dirty word in Minnesota. Po...
Read more | Comments (0)

More People Want a Walkable Lifestyle
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update Walking is great. It’s a healthier form of transportation for you and the environment, but every time I talk abou...
Read more | Comments (0)

We Must Invest in a Clean Energy Economy
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update Tomorrow marks three months since the BP oil spill. It’s a harsh reminder that the key to our energy future lies...
Read more | Comments (0)

Lowering Waiters' Wages is Unacceptable
| Joe's Blog: Brief State Supreme Court Update A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away (by which I mean last week at the Eagle Street Grille), Emmer claimed tha...
Read more | Comments (0)

* NOTE: ABM is not responsible for the content of member postings.



Search Blog