Alliance for a Better Minnesota

Submitted for Research,Public Info, Educational

 Statutes at Large Home Page: U.S. Congressional Documents

The United States Statutes at Large, commonly referred to as the Statutes at Large, is the official source for the laws and resolutions passed by Congress. Publication began in 1845 by the private firm of Little, Brown and Company under authority granted by a joint resolution of Congress. In 1874, Congress transferred the authority to publish the Statutes at Large to the Government Printing Office, which has been responsible for producing the set since that time.

Every law, public and private, ever enacted by the Congress is published in the Statutes at Large in order of the date of its passage. Until 1948, all treaties and international agreements approved by the Senate were also published in the set. In addition, the Statutes at Large includes the text of the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, amendments to the Constitution, treaties with Indians and foreign nations, and presidential proclamations.

We now have the complete set of U.S. Statutes at large from 1789 through
2007 online at http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/sal/sal.htm

.* The
files are PDF image-over-text and searchable. We have a local search
form on the page that will enable search through the entire set once
Google indexes it. To the best of our knowledge they are not available
anywhere else online, either on a government site or a university site.

Thanks for production and OCR of the PDF files is due to lawyer and
scholar Larry Becraft of Huntsville, Alabama.
______Larry Becraft - Google Search
* A little clean-up work remains on this page. We will add the 2008
Statutes at Large as soon as they are available. Note that Vols. 6-8 are
not a gap in the statutes, only in the volume numbering.

-- Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001    www.constitution.org  jon.roland@constitution.org

sharon4anderson@aol.com

          Submitted for educational, study the pdf briefs and write your own

Link repeated: Sharon a Political "Junkie" Non-lawyer, Not a liar either, prudent for All Bloggers  even Lawyers Minnesota Nice or Minnesota Mess?

Obama And That Other Ponzi Scheme - December 31, 2008

Richardson withdraws bid to be commerce secretary - twincities.com - Yahoo! Buzz

 politics makes strange bedfellows - Google Search

Politics makes strange bedfellows. The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. 2002

Political interests can bring together people who otherwise have little in common. This saying is adapted from a line in the play The Tempest, by William Shakespeare: “Misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows.” It is spoken by a man who has been shipwrecked and finds himself seeking shelter beside a sleeping monster.near v. minnesota 1931 - Google Search

Submitted to Affiant by FreedomLawSchoolGroup Rich Martin DFL

Obama And That Other Ponzi Scheme - December 31, 2008

Back to US Senate 08 found at www.mncourts.gov  Lawyers Democracy Fund Motion Amicus Curiae

 is used in the context of E-mail E-Commerce Notification. Non-Profits involved in the Election Process in accordance with Title 26 501(c)3, Minnesota has 2 Jewish Candidates Frankin and Coleman, Al Franken Lawyer MN - Google Search Not sure if Franken is a Lawyer, Issue: Lawyer Coleman former DFL Mayor,US Senator, should also testify on his Vote in accordance with the 1 man 1 vote theoryOne Man One Vote - Google Search

Title 26 501c3 - Google Search Submitted for educational purposes, Voters who are PC,PDF literate, should also file Letter Briefs.???

Suppressed EvidenceLisaFoster case heard by Canvass Board Member Judge Ed Cleary, http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdf

Submitted to Ramsey County Canvass Shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us City Clerk now in the Legislative Branch  who by the delegation of Power of St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman  in the Executive Branch gave his Canvass Board Seat Away?

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1412-2007-04-15T191746Z/ApplBlog5Apr07_71.pdf

Sharons Sample Briefs SHARON-MN-ECF: FOIA-06cv-PERMISSION TO INVESTIGAGE,COPY,CIRCULATE

 HAPPY NEW YEAR  2009 QUESTIONS:

May it please the  MN & US Court's and Alliance MN Separation of Powers Doctrine  How can a fair,impartial  canvass, when the Board Judges are in two branchs of government at the same time,  re: Krengel Public Nuisance and US Senate08

 Apparantly the Lawyer Judges on the State Canvass Board in the Executive Branch have also scheduled EnBanc Oral Argument in the Judicial Branch

By info and belief the www.mncourts.gov and US Supreme Court Supreme Court of the United States have serious Election Questions  Jan09.

 Calendar Alice Krengel: Alice Krengel EnBanc Mon5Jan09 A07-310MN Supreme Court  Public Nuisance Laws  also found via Google re: Briggs and Morgan Summary  http://www.briggs.com/files/upload/CourtWatch11.2008.pdfWe the Public must Intervene as the Attorney General refuse's on Constitutionality.609.74, Minnesota Statutes 2007  1) Eminent Domain: Public Use
http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/issinfo/clssemntdom.htm
2) Eminent Domain: Just Compensation
http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/issinfo/clssedjust.htm

and Minnesota Senate Seat ’08 ElectionNews results for MN Canvass Board
RTT News After Unofficial Tally, Senator Trails Rival in Minnesota Race - 20 hours ago
By MICHAEL FALCONE Al Franken’s narrow lead in the race for a Senate seat from Minnesota grew slightly on Tuesday, as the State Canvassing Board completed ...New York Times - 641 related articles »

EN BANC CALENDAR

Before the Minnesota Supreme Court

Summaries prepared by the Supreme Court Commissioner’s Office

Affiant Sharon Anderson  with Standing to Challenge the Minnesota State Primary 9Sept08_ (64A) to be filled 4Nov08 Elections, Sharon voted Absentee and by pdf format ie: Electronically was denied a Presidential Primary, did vote pdf 4Nov08,  If US Senate 08 Absentee Ballots are thrown Olmstead v US 277US438(1928)out the entire Ballot must be tossed:If Government become the Lawbreaker  and these ballots do NOT DECEND TO PARTICULARS us v. cruikshank - Google Search  and for educational purposes   to Notify the State of Minnesota,Minnesota State Constitution Electorate, Governor,Legislature,Canvass Boards,MN Supreme CourtMinnesota Constitution: Article III, all Voters and Candidates  on this New Years Eve

of yet another US Supreme Court filingshttp://www.obamacrimes.info/Copy%20of%20ComplaintSoetoroInterpleader122708.pdf objecting to Obamas Qualifications taken from  http://www.americasright.com/ must also relate Dr. Orlys Urgent letter to Congress  Author Ann Coulters_Guilty and 3rd Another A Natural Born Citizen...Orly?: Open letter to Member of Congress

Best-selling author Ann Coulter hopes

Philip Berg's earlier case and a request for an injunction in the case are scheduled for conferences with the justices on Jan. 9 and Jan. 16.

The new case, filed with co-counsel Lawrence J. Joyce, was submitted to U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., and names as defendant "Barry Soetoro a/k/a Obama."

It demands to know Obama's real name and his constitutional qualifications to occupy the Oval Office. The plaintiff is Gregory S. Hollister, a resident of Colorado Springs, who has "standing" and "needs a decision so he knows whether or not to follow any order of Soetoro a/k/a Obama."

Submitted in Good Faith for Election Reform, Integrity for the Public's Right to Know, MN Canvass Board to challenge Ballots without evidentiary hearing of the Author of the Ballot is Constitutionally Unacceptable.in other words, these Canvass Judges ie: Lawyers except Sec. State Mark Ritchie, are implementing their own opinions without coming face to face with the Author of the Ballots, ie: Voter.  techinally a copyright violations? by these Judges?

PS Are you aware Obama-Biden-Hillary_Coulter_Orly_Berg are all LAWYERS

Dear Sharon Please go to http://change.gov and sign in to submit and vote on questions, especially those submitted by me. I don't know if this will have much impact, but it could, and we need to take advantage of every opportunity to defend the Constitution. You can find my questions by searching on my name or on "constitution". Please spread this message to other forums. -- Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------- Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 www.constitution.org jon.roland@constitution.org

 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Transition Team

• Open for Questions
• Happy Holidays
• Your Weekly Address

To change this country, we're counting on Americans from every walk of life to get involved. Tell us how an experience in your life showed you something that is right or something that is wrong with this country -- and share your ideas for how to make it better.

May it Please AllianceMN Sharon must share her numerous e-mails of info. today 3 are Relevant, check the links on Blogs.

Regardless of Political Affiliations, this Political Junkie HaHa is rather well read an informed For the New Year

Dear Sharon: 

Thanks again for reading WorldNetDaily – the Internet's premiere independent news website. Following is a message we believe will interest you. As always, we appreciate your readership and support  Sincerely,The WorldNetDaily team Author of Born Liberal, Raised Right'

CIVIL PROCEDURE, CONTRACTS, CORPORATION & ENTERPRISE LAW, SECURITIES LAW
Abbotts v. Campbell, No. 08-1349
Participants in a Common Stock Purchase Agreement failed to show that the nondisclosure of a waiver of certain provisions of that Agreement was a proximate cause of their investment losses. The investors also failed to show that they exercised reasonable diligence warranting equitable tolling of the six-year statute of limitations specified by Minnesota Statute section 541.05. Read more...

Educational pdf format Findlaw,http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/8th/081349p.pdf

If you can't open get a password  & pagesUnited States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT___________

No. 08-1349

___________

Glenn D. Abbotts; Steven Beigel; *

Alyn Bell; Michael Cetta; Andrew R. *

Cherna; Richard Cooper; Stewart W. *

Evey; Timothy J. Hanratty; F. Scott *

Jackson; Jeffrey Kaufman; Anis *

Keywood; Gerald Moreland; James T. *

Reilley; Rick Starr, Sean L. Sullivan; * Appeal from the United States

James J. Walsh, * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Appellants, *

*

v. **

Caldwell Campbell, Esq.; Rowland W. *

Day, II, Esq.; Day & Campbell, L.L.P., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: November 12, 2008

Filed: December 29, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Minnesota.

-2-

summary judgment in favor of Cadwell Campbell, Rowland Day, and Day &

Campbell, L.L.P. (collectively, Defendants). We affirm.

I.

On July 16, 1992, Day sent a “Dear Potential Investor” letter to the Investors,

enclosing the Common Stock Purchase Agreement (CSPA) for International Gaming

Management (IGM), business documents related to IGM, an Investor Suitability

Questionnaire, and the signature page for the CSPA. The letter explained the

documents and the income/net worth requirements for investing in IGM. The letter

specifically noted that the investment was “a high risk investment” and that “each

investor could lose the entire amount of his investment.” Each Investor complied with

the letter’s requirements and purchased a minimum of 20,000 shares of IGM for $1.50

each.

As explained in Day’s letter, the shares purchased by the Investors under the

CSPA were not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and

would not be freely tradeable until so registered. Day explained that under SEC Rule

144, the Investors typically would have to hold the shares for two years before

attempting to sell the stock, but that he had negotiated with IGM to allow his law firm,

Day & Campbell, to immediately register the stock on behalf of the Investors. This

would allow the Investors to sell prior to the expiration of the two-year period. Day

stated that “[t]he registration process could take approximately 180 days to be

completed.” The Investors were also permitted to sell their shares prior to registration

by complying with the requirements of the CSPA and SEC Regulation S. Regulation

S would likely result in a significantly discounted price and would require the

-3-

potential seller to obtain an opinion of counsel that the sale was exempt from

registration requirements.

Day was unable to register the shares as promised. On April 30, 1993, IGM

asked its outside counsel, Dorsey & Whitney, to prepare a registration statement. On

July 15, 1993, IGM’s president wrote to all CSPA investors, advising them that the

registration statement had been filed and that IGM expected the stock to become

freely tradeable within forty to ninety days. The SEC, however, did not accept IGM’s

registration statement, following which IGM eventually abandoned its efforts to

register the CSPA stock because the two-year holding period under Rule 144 was

nearing expiration.

Meanwhile, Day negotiated an agreement with IGM on behalf of the CSPA

investors. Pursuant to this agreement, IGM would waive certain provisions of the

CSPA, thereby removing some of the impediments to complete a Regulation S sale.

Day & Campbell did not advise any of the CSPA investors of this waiver, and

although Day claims to have verbally communicated the waiver’s existence to two of

the Investors, both deny such communication. On the day that the waiver went into

effect, July 2, 1993, Day attempted to sell 200,000 CSPA shares. The sale was not

completed, however, because Dorsey & Whitney refused to provide the necessary

opinion of counsel. The law firm permitted Day to seek the opinion from other

counsel, but Day made no effort to do so.

During the time that Dorsey & Whitney attempted to register the shares and

Day negotiated the waiver, IGM’s share price was at its highest level, trading at

approximately $10 per share. By early 1994, however, IGM was in significant

financial distress. On July 28, 1994, federal and state authorities executed a search

warrant and seized documents from IGM’s office pursuant to a criminal investigation

of several IGM executives. The following day, share prices for IGM dropped

substantially, leading to the suspension of trading of IGM stock. IGM later failed,

rendering its stock worthless.

the board of directors of IGM until 1992. After IGM failed in 1994, Kallenbach was

appointed to IGM’s board and attempted to salvage parts of IGM’s business.

-4-

In 2000, the government returned all of IGM’s seized documents to Mark

the documents in connection with that litigation, Kallenbach discovered the waiver.

Kallenbach sued Defendants based on the undisclosed waiver on behalf of himself and

his wife. His case was settled in 2003.

Eleven years after the failure of IGM and after settling his own suit against

Defendants, Mark Kallenbach wrote to the Investors about potential claims that they

may have against Campbell and Day based on the undisclosed waiver. Nineteen

CSPA investors responded to Kallenbach’s letter and in March 2006 filed suit in

Minnesota state court against Campbell and Day and their law firm for breach of

fiduciary duty, negligent omission, attorney malpractice, and front running.

Defendants removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction.

Two Investors dismissed their claims after acknowledging that they had signed a

release in favor of Day & Campbell in the settlement of a related case, and one

Investor dropped out of the case. The remaining sixteen Investors filed cross-motions

for summary judgment.

The district court denied the Investors’ motion for summary judgment and

granted Defendants’ motion, holding that the statute of limitations on the Investors’

claims had expired and equitable tolling was not warranted as a matter of law. The

court also concluded that the Investors had not presented sufficient evidence that

Defendants’ failure to inform them of the waiver was a proximate cause of their

investment losses. It is from this judgment that the Investors now appeal.

-5-

II.

The Investors concede that the six-year statute of limitations under Minnesota

Statute § 541.05 has expired. They argue, however, that the period should be tolled

because Defendants fraudulently concealed the waiver. Additionally, they argue that

there was sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment that the concealment was

the proximate cause of their losses.

We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Barry v.

Barry, 78 F.3d 375, 379 (8th Cir. 1996). Summary judgment is appropriate if the

evidence on file “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that

the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). The

movant bears the burden of making this showing. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S.

317, 323 (1986). The party opposing the motion “must set forth specific facts

showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477

U.S. 242, 256 (1986). Although the evidence must be viewed in the light most

favorable to the nonmovant, id. at 255, mere speculation is not enough to avoid

summary judgment. Gregory v. Rogers, 974 F.2d 1006, 1010 (8th Cir. 1992).

A.

The Investors have not shown that they exercised reasonable diligence

warranting equitable tolling of the statute of limitations period. Minnesota does not

apply a discovery rule to any of the Investor’s claims, but rather applies “the damage

rule of accrual, under which the cause of action accrues and the statute of limitations

begins to run when some damage has occurred as a result of the alleged malpractice.”

Antone v. Mirviss, 720 N.W.2d 331, 335-36 (Minn. 2006) (citing Herrmann v.

McMenomy & Severson, 590 N.W.2d 641, 643 (Minn. 1999)) (internal quotations

omitted). Because the Investors suffered their financial loss in July 1994, the statute

of limitations began to run at this time.

-6-

Minnesota does, however, apply the discovery rule to allegations of fraud.

Barry, 78 F.3d at 379-80. For fraud claims, “the six year limitations period begins to

run when a plaintiff knew or should have known of the fraud.” Id. In such cases,

“the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that she could not, through reasonable

diligence, have discovered the facts constituting the fraud until within six years of the

commencement of the action.” Id. at 380 (citing Blegen v. Monarch Life Ins. Co., 365

N.W.2d 356, 357 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). Further, fraudulent concealment of

information material to a non-fraud claim will toll a limitations period. Cohen v.

Appert, 463 N.W.2d 787, 790 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). Likewise, the doctrine of

fraudulent concealment “only tolls the limitations period until the concealment is or

could have been discovered through reasonable diligence.” Id. at 790-91 (citing Wild

v. Rarig, 234 N.W.2d 775, 795 (Minn. 1975)). The party relying on the doctrine must

show that its own negligence did not contribute to the delay in discovery. Cohen, 463

N.W.2d at 791.

Following IGM’s collapse in July 1994, the Investors made no effort to obtain

the documents seized by the government to investigate the reason for IGM’s failure.

The Investors simply state that they could not have discovered the waiver because it

was in government custody. The record shows, however, that access was granted to

Daniel T. Zacharias after he explained that he hoped to rehabilitate IGM. Although

Zacharias’s access was limited because the government was preparing its case, there

is no indication that the government would have denied access to the Investors or that

it would not have provided the documents upon completion of its case. The Investors

knew that Defendants failed to register their shares as promised and that this prevented

them from selling their shares for a profit. They also knew that something was

drastically wrong when the FBI raided IGM. Yet, the Investors sought no recourse

from Defendants. Following the complete loss of their investment in IGM, the

Investors have largely lost or discarded their documents relating to their investment

and have written off the losses they incurred.

-7-

As the district court noted, it appears that the Investors gave no thought to IGM

until an attorney’s solicitation letter touting a previous success arrived eleven years

after the loss. The record reflects indifference and opportunism rather than reasonable

diligence. “Statutes of limitation serve a general purpose of repose, the interest of

both the defendant and society in freedom from stale claims.” Bartlett v. Miller &

Schroeder Muns., Inc., 355 N.W.2d 435, 439 (Minn. App. 1984). The interests of

justice do not require the tolling of the limitations period in this instance. See id.

B.

Additionally, the Investors “have failed to present specific facts giving rise to

a genuine issue for trial as to the causal connection” between their losses and the

nondisclosure of the waiver. Lubbers v. Anderson, 539 N.W.2d 398, 401 (Minn.

1995). Although proximate cause is generally a fact question for the jury, “where

reasonable minds can arrive at only one conclusion, proximate cause is a question of

law.” Lubbers, 539 N.W.2d at 402 (quoting Warnick v. Moss & Barnett, 490 N.W.2d

108, 113 (Minn. 1993)). The Investors’ proximate cause argument rests on the bald

assertion that they would have sold their shares if they had known of the waiver. That

one can look back with the knowledge of fluctuating stock prices and the impending

failure of the company and say that he would have sold at a particular time is simply

too self-serving and speculative to form the foundation of a causal connection. The

record, including the Investor’s expert testimony, does “nothing more than show a

mere possibility, suspicion, or conjecture that such a causal connection exists, without

any foundation for the exclusion of other admittedly possible causes,” and thus

“provides no proper foundation for a finding of a causal connection.” Bernloehr v.

Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 208 N.W.2d 753, 755 (Minn. 1973).

The Investors’ claims do not merit equitable tolling and the Investors have

failed to present sufficient evidence of causation. Accordingly, the district court’s

judgment is affirmed.

____________________Sharons Disclaimer __________Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 political ?(Sharon4Anderson?)
Alliance for a Better Minnesota | Sharon Anderson's Blog Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs
Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson | Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw
 NOTICE:  This communication is not encrypted.  This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

read our release below:

Alliance for a Better Minnesota Asks Coleman to Refund Toussie Funds

Bush Recanted Planned Pardon of Swindler,
Father Maxed Out to Coleman Re-Election

Saint Paul, Minn. -- Alliance for a Better Minnesota (ABM) a grassroots lobbying and online organizing group that works with progressive groups, requested today that U.S. Senator Norm Coleman refund the $4,600 his campaign received from Robert Toussie, the father of convicted swindler Isaac R. Toussie who ran a scheme funneling funds from working-class homeowners in New York state, and his wife. Both father and son were named in a class action suit filed on behalf of homeowners who lost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Isaac Toussie has entered the news lately because he is the only person in recent history known to have been pardoned by a President -- and then un-pardoned. News reports indicate that President Bush decided against the recommendation to pardon Isaac Toussie when the severity of his crimes came to light.

“At a time when most people are trying to hold on to everything they have, we need our elected officials to take our side,” said Denise Cardinal, Executive Director of Alliance for a Better Minnesota. “Clearly, the Toussie family is not on the side of working Americans, and the funds donated to Senator Coleman from Robert Toussie may have come from questionable sources. We’re asking the Senator to return those funds.”

The news about Toussie’s donation to Coleman comes on the heels of other news reports state that Coleman will be using funds raised for his re-election campaign to pay for legal fees associated with a reported ongoing FBI investigation and lawsuit. The lawsuit, filed in Texas, states that Coleman’s friend Nasser Kazeminy funneled $75,000 to Coleman through the Senator’s wife. ABM has asked the FEC to look into the matter.

Copies of the letter ABM sent to the Senator’s office and the FEC can be found at: www.allianceminnesota.org

ABM is also providing Minnesotans the chance to sign a petition to show the FBI and the Senate Select Committee on Ethics support for the investigation by visiting: http://pnmn.bluestatedigital.com/page/petition/Investigatenorm

####
 

Read it here, or below:

Office of Senator Norm Coleman

2550 University Ave W

Suite 100N

St. Paul, MN 55114

To Senator Norm Coleman:

It has recently been reported that your campaign has received $4,600 from Robert Toussie and his wife in contributions.

Recent news reports of the Toussie family’s involvement in a housing scheme that swindled hundreds of thousands of dollars from hard-working people in New York state has brought the campaign contributions into question.

Other news reports from last week show President Bush took the unprecedented move of rescinding a pardon for Isaac Toussie, Robert’s son, because the crimes were so onerous.

With these revelations, we respectfully ask you to return the campaign contributions made by the Toussie family to your reelection effort.

Thank you,

Denise Cardinal

Alliance for a Better Minnesota

1600 University Ave. W. Suit 309B

Saint Paul, MN 55104

Read about it here:

http://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2008/12/25/5537/bush_pardon_donor_gave_4600_to_coleman

 Supreme Court of the United States

 Basicall Recent DecisionsPlease note that the Supreme Court Building will be closed on December 26, 2008, January 2, 2009, and January 20, 2009.  > Docket > Oral Arguments Supreme Court Calendar (PDF) Argument Calendars > Links

• Administrative Office of the United States Courts
• Supreme Court Fellows Program
• White House
• Department of Justice
• United States Senate
• United States House of Representatives

• y Reading Abstracts,Realestate,Titles, pdf Court Documents, in this high tech age, US Supreme Court Documents to hold precedant must be highly published,circulated for the Public.

us supreme court docket - Google Search

Dear Sharon: 

Here's the very latest from WorldNetDaily -- the Internet's premiere independent news website. You can always count on WND for the hottest and most important stories, the ones that make a difference to you -- seven days a week. 

As always, we appreciate your readership and support.

Sincerely,

The WorldNetDaily team

WorldNetDaily News Alerts are sponsored by:
 
Swiss America Trading Corporation

Take advantage of Swiss America's latest free CD offer on the future of gold and silver.

To immediately and permanently unsubscribe, click here.

Visit our Privacy Policy if you have any questions:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/resources/privacy.asp

All Shop.WND.com products can be ordered by visiting:
http://shop.wnd.com/store
or by calling toll-free 1-(800)-4-WNDCOM (1.800.496.3266).

-------------------

This email brought to you by:

WorldNetDaily.com
249 E. Ocean Blvd. Ste. 325
Long Beach, CA 90802
Copyright 1997-2008 WorldNetDaily.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Happy Safe,Security,Sane New Year: 2009 pdf Documents are Prime. Sharons Buzz Avatar Fun Huh

Submitted for Educational Purposes, 

Title 26 501c3, to consolidate favorite's

 Pristine Holidays, MIss DFL AG Match, its a shame Lori has not continued the Works of the Attorney Generals OfficeYouTube - Impact Of Tourism On MN Environment-Governor Candidates

In keeping with Environmental Issues Conflicting Cases , WE MUST HAVE UNIFORMITY, RULE OF LAW,DUE PROCESS TO ALL. Gearin also on currant Canvass. contrary to MN Const. Art.III Separation of Powers.

www.mncourts.gov,with Unpublished_Retired Judges denying due process  to any all ProSe Litigants by Bonding Indebtness  Court of Appeals Unpublished Opinions same day Published Opinions Court of Appeals Published Opinions

A07-2206        Port Authority of the City of St. Paul, petitioner, 
                        Respondent, vs. RLR, Inc., et al., Defendants; 
                        Insurance Auto Auctions, Inc., Appellant.
                        Ramsey County District Court, Hon. Kathleen R. Gearin.
            To satisfy the requirement in Minn. Stat. § 117.041, subd. 2(a)(1) (2006), that it has reason to believe that acquisition of property may be required pursuant to eminent-domain proceedings, a political subdivision must identify a public use or public purpose for which the property could be acquired in eminent-domain proceedings.
            Reversed.  Judge Randolph W. Peterson.

23rDec08 Tues

Appellant initiated a declaratory judgment action pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act to challenge the adequacy of an environmental impact   

• Document

re John FinleyI Complaint John T. Finley, Ramsey County Distri is Bizzare 42 USC 3631

Civil Rights Division Home Page

Then we go to Lori Swanson MN Monthly - Google Search

 Voice for you or Conflict of Interest? Environmental Concern of Sharon Scarrella Anderson ownership of Buck Lake,Gun Lake Propertys Sen. Ellen Anderson, MN district 66Click here: Four named to council | International Falls Daily Journal

 Ellen Anderson  apparantly authored the Constitutional amendment,raising our taxes, then appointed to the oversight committee apparant Conflict?

Do not forget she is Andy Dawkins wife, Defendant in the previous post.This Blogger has had major problems with the  DFL Judiciary up north, her Aitkin Property near a Gravel Pit, Hazardus Waste Dump,  Indian Buriel Grounds, Pollution of GunLake,"taking" of Sharons Road for Greed, Ingress-Egress to overbuild contrary to http://www.co.aitkin.mn.us/ordinances/Shoreland-Ord-2008-Amend.pdf

Wilful neglience to Quiet Title to the Gun Lake Property, Buck Lake Propertys re: http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com 

For Public Education  Title 26 501 c3Shutting off Sharons Water re: www.sharonanderson.org  unabated by Public Officials, re:Environmental groups sue over EPA mining rule

Earthjustice: Environmental Law: Because the Earth Needs a Good Lawyer

http://www.earthjustice.org/library/legal_docs/sbz-rule-final-complaint-12-19.pdf

 By the Grace of God, Turbulence of Nature, Request for All Bloggers,Reporters, Whistleblowers for help before another Death occurs.SlideShare » Sharon4anderson's Slidespace (SlideShare is the best place to share powerpoint presentations) 5 (5 public) Slideshows 1058 Warrant 34 1 day ago
28 views, 0 comments Aitkin Ans0332 27 1 day ago
21 views, 0 comments Copaitkbgs 1 day ago
24 views, 0 comments Four name

Saxhaug to serve as outreach ambassador

Minnesota State Senate Majority Leader Larry Pogemiller, DFL-Minneapolis, last week announced the appointments of Lester Bensch, Michael Kilgore, Sen. Ellen Anderson, DFL-St. Paul, and Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen, GOP-Alexandria, to the Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council.

The 12 member council will recommend how to use the newly created Outdoor Heritage Fund, a constitutionally dedicated revenue source to be used to benefit Minnesota’s outdoors. The council met for the first time Monday, and will provide guidance and recommendations to the Legislature.
The Outdoor Heritage Fund and Council were created by the passage of the "The Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment” in November.

The council is named in honor of former state Senator Bob Lessard, DFL-International Falls, who championed the issue during his time at the legislature and after he left in 2002. The council will examine projects throughout the state and provide its recommendations to the legislature by April 1.
In addition to the members named to the council, Sen. Majority Leader Pogemiller has designated two Senators as outreach ambassadors to communities with interest: Sen. Satveer Chaudhary, DFL-Fridley, for hunting and fishing, and Sen. Tom Saxhaug, DFL-Grand Rapids, for forestry.

  QUESTIONS: Has Federal Judge Joan Erickson  by not submitting RICO Corrupt Conduct by the City of St.Paul to the Grand Jury, Quitam to US Attorney etal? Committed Prejudicial Error?

Apology if pdf Grand Jury | Google Groups  link doesn't work

http://grandjury.googlegroups.com/web/SummaryJudgementOrder.pdf...

Criminal RICO Statutes_Prejudicial Error - Google Search

MN Judge Joan Erickson - Google Search BLOGGERS HELP also found at

posted by Bob at Friday, December 19, 2008 27 comments links to

 1.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Frank J. Steinhauser, III, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil No. 04-2632 (JNE/SRN)

ORDER City of St. Paul et al., Defendants. Sandra Harrilal et al., Plaintiffs,

v. Civil No. 05-461 (JNE/SRN)

ORDER

City of St. Paul et al.,

Defendants.

Thomas J. Gallagher et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Civil No. 05-1348 (JNE/SRN)

ORDER

City of St. Paul et al.,

Defendants.

John R. Shoemaker, Esq., Shoemaker & Shoemaker, PLLC, appeared for Plaintiffs Frank J.

Steinhauser, III, Mark E. Meysembourg, Kelly G. Brisson, Sandra Harrilal, and Steven R.

Johnson d/b/a Market Group and Properties.

Matthew A. Engel, Esq., Aase, Engel & Kirscher, PLLC, appeared for Plaintiffs Thomas J.

Gallagher, Joseph J. Collins, Sr., Dadder’s Properties, LLC, Dadder’s Estates, LLC, Dadder’s

Enterprises, LLC, Dadder’s Holdings, LLC, Troy Allison, Jeff Kubitschek, and Sara Kubitschek.

Plaintiffs Bee Vue and Lamena Vue did not appear.

Louise Toscano Seeba, Esq., St. Paul City Attorney’s Office, appeared for Defendants City of St.

Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated above, IT

IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 198 in Civil

No. 04-2632, Docket No. 173 in Civil No. 05-461, and Docket No. 166 in

Civil No. 05-1348] are GRANTED.

2. All Counts in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jane Roe.

3. Counts VI in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent they are based on the right to

freedom from the taking of property without just compensation under the

Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

4. Count VIII in Civil No. 05-1348 is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

5. Except as stated in paragraphs 2-4, all remaining claims in Civil Nos.

04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: December 18, 2008

s/ Joan N. Ericksen

JOAN N. ERICKSEN

United States District Judge

A federal judge dismissed a series of long-standing lawsuits against the city of St. Paul, brought by a group of landlords who claimed they were discriminated against because they rented to "protected classes," particularly minorities.

In a summary judgment, U.S. District Judge Joan Erickson dismissed three suits brought by 16 plaintiffs — identified as "current or former owners of rental properties" — who say they were targeted by the city when it began to enforce a more stringent housing code.

They also alleged the city conducted unconstitutional searches of their properties, held their properties to a different standard than public housing and violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

Erickson noted repeatedly that the plaintiffs did not provide adequate evidence to support their claims.

Also named as defendants in the suit were more than a dozen individuals, including former Mayor Randy Kelly and officials with the Department of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement, including former director Andy Dawkins and supervisor Steve Magner.

— Tad Vezner 

   Sharon who also has been heinously harmed, has Submitted for Educational Purposes with pdf Court Order for the taxpaying Public with Strict Scrunity review,http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdf

Heard at www.am1500.com Just had to post, Advocate of E-Voting,E-Commerce,

Australian couple served with legal documents via Facebook - Telegraph

Last Updated: 4:16PM GMT 16 Dec 2008

In what may be a world first, lawyers from Canberra law firm Meyer Vandenberg persuaded a judge in the Australian Capital Territory's Supreme Court to allow them to serve the documents over the internet after repeatedly failing to serve the papers in person.

Lawyer Mark McCormack came up with the Facebook plan after it became clear that the couple did not want to be found.

Carmel Rita Corbo and Gordon Poyser had failed to keep up repayments on a $150,000 (£44,000) loan they had borrowed from MKM Capital, a mortgage provider.

The pair had ignored emails from the law firm and did not attend a court appearance on Oct 3. Mr McCormack said the pair had "vanished".

Please take time to view this Happy Christmas Ontrack Data Recovery Services, really enjoyed the oven burnt laptop,Happy Christmas - Ontrack Data Recovery Services from Kroll Ontrack 2008

Legal Technologies, Data Recovery, Software - Kroll Ontrack US Senate/Supreme Hear We Come Ready or Not.  Any Voter must excerise their Rights to File Amicus Curie Briefs or Petitions, to have Standing to even Challenge Ballots?  Isn't this Fun  The best Part is Suing Judges.....Separation of Powers Doctrine,


Minnesota Hometown Company: Go to www.mncourts.gov click on Senate Files,Sharon's Interest Amicus Briefs:http://www.mncourts.gov/Documents/0/Public/Other/2008%20Elections/Amicus.pdf

• Order (12-18-08)
• Webcast of Oral Arguments (12-17-08)
• Order (12-17-08)
• Motion for Admission of Harvey M. Tettlebaum (12-16-08)
• Motion for Admission of Mark G. Arnold (12-16-08)
• Motion to File Amicus Brief (12-16-08)
• Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (12-16-08)
• Reply Memorandum (12-16-08)
• Proposed Order (12-16-08)
• Proposed Interim Order (12-16-08)
• Affidavit of Cullen Sheehan (12-16-08)
• Second Affidavit of James K. Langdon (12-16-08)
• Order (12-16-08)
• Brief of Al Franken (12-16-08)- Request a copy by e-mail
• Response of the Hennepin County Canvassing Board (12-16-08)
• Affidavit of Catherine E. Mohn (12-16-08)
• Affidavit of Gary R. Poser (12-16-08)
• State's Response to Petition (12-16-08) 
• Affidavit of James K. Langdon (12-15-08)
• Motion of Al Franken to Intervene (12-15-08)
• Order (12-15-08)
• Motion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order or Temporary Injunction (12-15-08)
• Amended Petition for an Order to Show Cause (12-15-08)

• Petition for an Order to Show Cause (12-15-08)

• 11-19-08 Order

• 11/10/08 Order